Case 3302264/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Caro Serrano v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302264/2020
- Decision date
- 28 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT The
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Caro Serrano
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the tribunal decided the case on the information before Employment Judge Warren. On that basis, the tribunal found that Muneka Catering Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr S Caro Serrano's wages.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The judgment does not set out separate factual findings for each head of claim, but it records both claims as established.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Caro Serrano the gross sum of £1,600 without deduction. The judgment does not break that sum down between the wages claim and the holiday entitlement claim, and it does not record any additional award for interest or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages. The judgment records a single gross sum of £1,600 without deduction, but it does not apportion that amount between this claim and the holiday entitlement claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The judgment records a single gross sum of £1,600 without deduction, but it does not apportion that amount between this claim and the unauthorised deduction claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.