Case 3302302/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Hunter v Prim Dry Cleaners Ltd Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302302/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Hunter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Reed heard the case by Cloud video on 25 February 2021. The tribunal found that Prim Dry Cleaners Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr P Hunter's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay him £2,880 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent did not dismiss the claimant. On that basis, Mr Hunter's wrongful dismissal and redundancy payment claims failed and were dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no separate written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and directed payment of £2,880. | Upheld | — | £2,880 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found that the respondent did not dismiss the claimant, so the wrongful dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the respondent did not dismiss the claimant, so the redundancy payment claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,880
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.