Case 3302306/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Breedon v Jewson Limited Heard: Norwich — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302306/2022
- Decision date
- 20 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Breedon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Breedon brought claims for disability discrimination, unfair dismissal, breach of contract and holiday pay. The respondent did not attend the hearing and no valid response had been received by the tribunal by the response deadline. The tribunal recorded that the claim had been served by correctly addressed correspondence and that the respondent had not replied to any of the tribunal's subsequent correspondence.
On that basis, Employment Judge M Warren held that Mr Breedon was entitled to judgment as to liability on all four claims. The judgment did not set out findings on the underlying factual merits of each claim; it proceeded because the respondent had not entered a valid response and had not engaged with the proceedings.
Remedy was not determined on 5 August 2022. The tribunal noted that the respondent should have an opportunity to be heard on remedy and that it would be unfair to decide compensation without advance notice to the respondent. The remedy hearing was therefore postponed to 7 November 2022, with directions for the judgment and documents to be sent to the respondent's trading address and registered office.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Liability judgment only; remedy was adjourned to a later hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Liability judgment only; remedy was adjourned to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Liability judgment only; remedy was adjourned to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Liability judgment only; remedy was adjourned to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.