Case 3302314/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Failed to attend For the v Ms Wood (in-house representative) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302314/2022
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Failed to attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge Employment Tribunal on 10 November 2022 before Employment Judge King sitting alone. The claimant did not attend, and for the respondent Ms Wood asked for strike out because the claims were not being actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had failed to comply with the case management order dated 25 May 2022 by not providing disclosure or a witness statement, and that there had been no response to the respondent's correspondence.
An adjournment was taken to allow for the possibility that the claimant was simply late, but she still did not attend. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims both on the respondent's application and on the tribunal's own initiative. The reasons given were that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success on the papers seen, that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 25 May 2022, and that the claims had not been actively pursued. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the pleaded claim(s) in detail; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.