Case 3302318/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. L Foley v Post Mill Garage (Wymondham) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302318/2023
- Decision date
- 18 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heathcote
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. L Foley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ms L Foley's complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and that Post Mill Garage (Wymondham) Ltd unfairly dismissed her. It also found that the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice in relation to disciplinary and grievance matters, and for that reason uplifted the award by 25%. The decision was made by Employment Judge Heathcote sitting alone at Watford on 5 September 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award £1,976.00 and compensatory award £1,737.50, the latter including a 25% ACAS uplift. Separate notice pay of £228.00 was awarded under breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £3,714 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as the balance of statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £228 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,942
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,976
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,738
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.