Case 3302337/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Bibi Caunhye v The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302337/2020
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Bibi Caunhye
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Bibi Caunhye’s unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and therefore succeeded against The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The judgment does not record any other claims or any separate discrimination or contract findings.
On remedy, the tribunal stated that absent the errors in the process it was 75% likely the claimant would have been fairly dismissed, so any compensatory award would be reduced by 75% on that basis. It also found that the claimant caused or contributed to her dismissal entirely, and therefore any basic award and compensatory award would be reduced by 100%.
No quantified monetary award is set out in the extracted judgment text. On the face of the written record, the effect of the tribunal’s reductions was that no monetary award remained.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim was well-founded. The written record does not state a quantified monetary award. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.