Case 3302338/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Oakey Mrs K Simmons v Accure Limited and 3 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302338/2018
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mr A Kapur, Ms H T Edwards
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mrs G Oakey Mrs K Simmons
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 26 February 2020 before Employment Judge Anstis, sitting with Mr A Kapur and Ms H T Edwards. The judgment records that the claimants were represented by Mr L Kenealy and that the respondents were represented as set out in the judgment.
The tribunal's substantive order was brief: the claimants' claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not set out any findings on liability because the claims did not proceed to determination on the merits.
The only monetary order made was a costs order requiring the second respondent, The Heyfordian School Trust, to pay the first respondent, Accure Limited, £1,122.40 in respect of costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not spell out the underlying claim head, but the case was listed on gov.uk as unfair dismissal. It records only that the claimants' claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,122
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.