Case 3302340/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Kaneez Zahra and 9 Others v CCS Homecare Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302340/2021
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Kaneez Zahra and 9 Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal declared that it was a term of the claimants' contracts of employment that they would be paid on the basis of having worked a full shift, except for statutory breaks. It then held that the claims of unauthorised deductions from wages were well-founded and that the claims of accrued unpaid wages were well-founded.
Compensation was awarded in accordance with an agreed schedule. The schedule set out separate figures for deduction from wages and holiday pay for each of the ten claimants, with total losses of £1,038.32 for Asif Ahmed, £286.13 for Fardus Hassan, £164.59 for Gurprit Kaur, £359.23 for Ghazala Asghar, £399.42 for Petrona Buckham, £140.10 for Chaudhry Sohail, £598.66 for Michelle Barrell, £1,007.54 for Maryam Sharif, £597.67 for Kaneez Zahra, and £174.99 for Sawran Gill.
The bottom-line total awarded across the schedule was £4,766.65. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal declared that the claimants' contracts contained a term that they would be paid on the basis of having worked a full shift, except for statutory breaks. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claims of unauthorised deductions from wages were found well-founded; the agreed schedule allocated deduction-from-wages losses across the ten claimants totalling £4,253.26. | Upheld | — | £4,253 |
| Holiday pay | The claims described in the judgment as accrued unpaid wages were found well-founded; the agreed schedule allocated holiday pay losses across the ten claimants totalling £513.39. | Upheld | — | £513 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,767
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.