Case 3302348/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Marston v CCS Homecare Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302348/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Marston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal did not determine the underlying merits of the employment claims. It issued a letter dated 18 April 2023 giving Ms A Marston an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Foxwell ordered that the claim be struck out on 18 May 2023.
No remedy was awarded and no substantive findings were made on breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, or working time issues in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 18 April 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.