Case 3302353/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Smith v And Alubau Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302353/2020
- Decision date
- 24 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment under Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The respondent, Alubau Limited, indicated that it did not intend to contest Mr D Smith's claim.
On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis entered judgment that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages. The extracted judgment does not record any separate remedy sum, award breakdown, or other monetary figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent indicated it did not intend to contest the claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.