Case 3302373/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms C Broulidakis, Operations and Human Resources Manager Interpreter: Ms S Haslam — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302373/2023
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley For
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the effective date of termination was 17 November 2022, being the end of eight weeks’ notice after the claimant’s resignation on 22 September 2022. It therefore found that the claimant was not dismissed on or around 10 November 2022. The claim was held to have been brought in time, and the tribunal refused strike out of the response for alleged non-compliance with case management orders.
On the merits, the claimant’s complaint of unlawful deduction of wages succeeded in part. The tribunal said the claimant was not entitled to notice pay or any sums for gratuities. It ordered the respondent to pay gross sums of £317.92 for unpaid wages (SSP), £25.50 for underpayment of wages, £38.50 for underpayment of holiday pay, and £208.10 for further holiday entitlement, making a total award of £589.77.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said the complaint of unlawful deduction of wages succeeded in part. It found the effective date of termination was 17 November 2022, not 10 November 2022, and said the claimant was not entitled to notice pay or any sums for gratuities. The judgment ordered gross sums of £317.92, £25.50, £38.50, and £208.10, but it did not split the overall £589.77 award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £590
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.