Case 3302376/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A R Robalo Correia Miss C Rosa v Mr A Elbayoumi — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302376/2020
- Decision date
- 10 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A R Robalo Correia Miss C Rosa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants were said to have worked for the respondent between 10 September 2019 and 23 October 2019. They entered ACAS Early Conciliation between 6 December 2019 and 6 January 2020 and presented their claim on 21 January 2020. The respondent did not submit a response, and after the tribunal identified a possible typographical error in the postal address the claim was re-served on 19 September 2020, but no response was still received.
On 28 November 2020 and again on 3 January 2021, the tribunal asked the claimants to confirm the amounts they were seeking by way of compensation. They did not reply. The tribunal therefore listed a hearing for 10 August 2021, but the claimants did not attend and gave no notice that they could not attend. The clerk attempted to telephone them but the call did not connect.
Employment Judge Norris concluded that all practicable enquiries had been made and dismissed the claims under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records dismissal of the claims for failure to pay wages and does not make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to the claims as claims of failure to pay wages. No monetary award was made because the claims were dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimants did not attend and did not provide the amount sought. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 (Schedule 1, Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.