Case 3302387/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Landels v Artificial Solutions UK Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302387/2021
- Decision date
- 28 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Landels
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 14 August 2023, to make representations or request a hearing by 28 August 2023 about why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claims appeared to be duplicates of claims dealt with at London South, and that the claimant had been told by Employment Judge Ferguson to write to Watford/South East Region to withdraw, which did not appear to have been done.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim because it appeared to duplicate claims dealt with at London South and because the claimant did not respond to the strike-out warning. The short judgment does not adjudicate the underlying pleaded claim types. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.