Case 3302387/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Agrawal v 4c Associates Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302387/2023
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Partington Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Agrawal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Watford Employment Tribunal by CVP on 25 September 2023, before Employment Judge Partington, the Tribunal held that, having regard to the applicable statutory time limits, it did not have jurisdiction to deal with Miss R Agrawal's claims. The judgment records that the claims were therefore dismissed.
The extracted judgment does not set out separate factual or legal findings on each pleaded issue. The case is listed on GOV.UK under unlawful deduction from wages and working time regulations, but the judgment itself only records the jurisdictional dismissal and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type inferred from the published GOV.UK jurisdiction code; the judgment text itself refers only to the claimant's claims and dismisses them for want of jurisdiction due to statutory time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type inferred from the published GOV.UK jurisdiction code; the judgment text itself refers only to the claimant's claims and dismisses them for want of jurisdiction due to statutory time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.