Case 3302403/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Sloan v LTS Haulage Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302403/2023
- Decision date
- 15 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Read Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Sloan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B Sloan brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against LTS Haulage Ltd. The tribunal found that the complaint was well-founded and held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's final wages.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £1,715, described as the gross sum subject to unauthorised deduction. The tribunal also recorded that payment of the net sum, after deduction of relevant tax and national insurance from the £1,715, would satisfy the judgment.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided in the written record. The decision was sent to the parties on 15 November 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded in relation to the claimant's final wages. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,715 gross, with payment of the net sum after deductions for tax and national insurance stated to satisfy the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,715 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,715
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.