Case 3302438/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ramaswamy v Deloitte LLP — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302438/2022
- Decision date
- 27 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The claimant's age, race and marital status discrimination claims were dismissed upon withdrawal under Rule 52. The judgment records that there was no award for costs.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant's claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal was struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The claimant's age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The claimant's race discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment refers to this as a marital status discrimination claim and records it as dismissed upon withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.