Case 3302444/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Tom Clarke, Company Secretary — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302444/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord Members
- Venue
- Huntingdon
- Panel members
- Ms S Goding, Mr J Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Huntingdon on 12 June 2023 before Employment Judge M Ord, with lay members Ms S Goding and Mr J Williams. The written record sent to the parties on 9 August 2023 states that the claimant's claims were not well founded and were dismissed.
The supplied text does not set out separate factual findings, legal analysis, or any monetary award. It also records that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record does not specify the individual claim heads. This classification follows the case listing/context provided with the extraction, which identifies disability discrimination as one of the claims. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not specify the individual claim heads. This classification follows the case listing/context provided with the extraction, which identifies unfair dismissal as one of the claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.