Case 3302453/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F BREDA v Watford Apsav Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302453/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F BREDA
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 9 March 2023 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. It does not set out the underlying factual allegations or distinguish between separate heads of claim in the extracted text, but the case listing identifies the matter as involving unlawful deduction from wages and working time issues.
No remedy is determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not specify a separate outcome for this head of claim, but records that the claim succeeded under Rule 21 and that remedy will be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not specify a separate outcome for this head of claim, but records that the claim succeeded under Rule 21 and that remedy will be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.