Case 3302458/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H B Chhantel v Tryst Food Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302458/2022
- Decision date
- 6 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H B Chhantel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 28 February 2022 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Tryst Food Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr H B Chhantel’s wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £3,600 gross, taxable in the hands of the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £3,600 gross, taxable in the hands of the claimant. | Upheld | — | £3,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.