Case 3302465/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Smith v Mr Ji — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302465/2020
- Decision date
- 4 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for hearing at Watford Employment Tribunal on 4 January 2021 before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone. The claimant was Mr T Smith and the respondent was Mr Ji. Neither party appeared and neither was represented.
The tribunal attempted to contact both sides by telephone. A voicemail was left on the respondent’s number, and two attempts to telephone the claimant failed because the number did not seem to be in service. By 10.20am, neither party had arrived or provided an explanation for the non-attendance.
The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 on the basis that it did not appear to be actively pursued. The judgment records dismissal only and contains no findings on the substance of the wage deduction complaint or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed at the hearing under Rule 47 because neither party attended and the claim did not appear to be actively pursued. No merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.