Case 3302467/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wilding v Intech Products Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302467/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wilding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr A Wilding against Intech Products Limited. The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, had suffered unlawful deductions from wages, was dismissed in breach of contract, and was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The judgment did not fix the financial remedy. It directed that a hearing to determine remedy would be listed for two hours, and ordered the claimant to file and serve a schedule of financial losses together with supporting documents by 21 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.