Case 3302473/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Jordan v Pharma Auctions (BPA) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 3302473/2024
- Decision date
- 28 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCooey Appearances
- Venue
- Watford in public
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Jordan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave a judgment on remedy after a public CVP hearing at Watford on 28 April 2026. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £10,541.03 gross.
The award before interest was £8,938.47. It comprised unpaid wages of £3,692.31, made up of one day at £192.31 and contractual commission of £3,500; holiday pay of £553.85 for 2.88 days; and contractual notice pay of £4,692.31, calculated as six weeks at £5,769.23 less £1,076.92 for one week's salary from new employment.
The Tribunal ordered interest at 8% under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It recorded that the payments fell due on 31 January 2024, 818 days before the judgment date, producing interest of £1,602.56 and a total with interest of £10,541.03. Interest was to accrue after the payment date at £1.96 per day until payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unpaid wages award comprised one day of wages at £192.31 and contractual commission of £3,500. | Upheld | — | £3,692 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay award was for 2.88 days. | Upheld | — | £554 |
| Breach of contract | The contractual notice pay award was calculated as six weeks' notice pay of £5,769.23 less £1,076.92 for one week's salary from new employment. | Upheld | — | £4,692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,541
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.