Case 3302477/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Basharat v London Luton Airport Operations Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302477/2023
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Basharat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Basharat presented claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination and disability discrimination, but this judgment determined only a preliminary disability issue. Employment Judge Tynan, sitting alone, found that at the relevant times the claimant was not disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of carpal tunnel syndrome or by reason of stress, anxiety and depression. The tribunal therefore struck out the disability discrimination complaints as having no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment also records that the race discrimination claim had already been dismissed following withdrawal.
On carpal tunnel syndrome, the tribunal accepted that there was some evidence of more than minor or trivial effects by late December 2019 and January 2020, including difficulty using a mouse and lifting heavy luggage and shopping bags. However, those effects had only been present for weeks by 5 February 2020, and the contemporaneous medical evidence did not show that they were likely to last for at least 12 months. The recurrence provisions in Schedule 1 did not assist because there was no evidence of a continuous impaired ability to carry out day to day activities from December 2018 to October 2019.
On stress, anxiety and depression, the tribunal applied the approach in J v DLA Piper UK LLP and treated the evidence as a reaction to adverse workplace circumstances rather than a disabling mental impairment. It found that the medical records showed work related stress and anxiety that abated when the claimant was away from the workplace, with little or no adverse effect on ordinary day to day activities. The later diagnosis of mixed anxiety and depressive disorder in May 2023 did not establish disability at 7 November 2022, and the absence of expert medical evidence was a material gap in the claimant's case.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary disability judgment; the tribunal considered carpal tunnel syndrome and stress, anxiety and depression separately and struck out the disability discrimination complaints as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the race discrimination claim had already been dismissed following withdrawal; no merits finding was made in this judgment. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Paragraph 2, Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College
- All Answers Ltd v Mr W and Ms R
- Morgan v Staffordshire University
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Morris
- Dunham v Ashford Windows
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council
- Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.