Case 3302484/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Carnegie v CG Swim School Ltd R1 High Five Swim Ltd R2 Calum Gawthorpe R3 Christine Gawthorpe R4 — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302484/2024
- Decision date
- 29 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Carnegie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 7 May 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 21 May 2025 to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 December 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued, and that the reasons set out in the respondent's emails of 29 March 2025 and 15 April 2025 also supported strike out.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 15 to 18 July 2025 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the text provided. It records that the claim was struck out after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 7 May 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.