Case 3302486/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Nicoletti v Amey Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302486/2015
- Decision date
- 29 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Nicoletti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims. By a letter dated 29 November 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claims for not being actively pursued. The extracted judgment text does not set out the substantive particulars; this classification follows the listing category and should be treated with moderate confidence. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the claims for not being actively pursued. The extracted judgment text does not set out the substantive particulars; this classification follows the listing category and should be treated with moderate confidence. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.