Case 3302489/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. J.K. McRae v The Stunt Register Limited trading as The British Stunt Register Hearing: Final Hearing — 2026
- Case reference
- 3302489/2025
- Decision date
- 10 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. J.K. McRae
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that, during the relevant period in 2023, Ms J.K. McRae was a worker of The Stunt Register Limited trading as The British Stunt Register within s.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Her notice pay claim, claim concerning alleged underpaid workplace pension contributions, and unpaid expenses claim were dismissed on withdrawal. Her claim concerning alleged non-provision of a P45 was dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it.
The holiday pay claims were dismissed because they were not presented in time, although it had been reasonably practicable to present them in time. The Tribunal dismissed the remaining breach of contract claim because Ms McRae had not proved any financial loss proximately caused by the Respondent's failure to comply with its capability procedure before dismissing her on capability/performance grounds. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim concerning alleged underpaid workplace pension contributions; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for unpaid expenses; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim concerning alleged non-provision of a P45; dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claims were dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim based on failure to follow the Respondent's capability procedure before dismissal on capability/performance grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable time-limit test
- proximate causation of financial loss
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.