Case 3302492/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr L Millington, Solicitor — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302492/2024
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Sanders, brought a claim for unfair dismissal against Royal Mail Group Limited. The case was heard at Bury St Edmunds on 6 and 7 March 2025 before Employment Judge Laidler, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr L Millington, Solicitor.
The tribunal found that Mr Sanders was fairly dismissed by reason of conduct. It held that conduct was a potentially fair reason for dismissal within section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and for that reason the unfair dismissal claim failed.
The judgment records that the claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed. No monetary award was made and no separate remedy findings are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was fairly dismissed by reason of conduct, which was a potentially fair reason within section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.