Case 3302502/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Chaitraraj Naik Respondent Power Leisure Bookmakers Limited v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302502/2024
- Decision date
- 12 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shrimplin Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Chaitraraj Naik Respondent Power Leisure Bookmakers Limited
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Shrimplin on 11 and 12 August 2025, dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. It held that the dismissal was not unfair within the terms of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and gave oral reasons at the hearing.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay. It found that claim was not well founded. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision, and the note states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records a claim for unpaid holiday pay, which was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant's dismissal was not unfair within the terms of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.