Case 3302513/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Waters v Barnetts Coaches Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302513/2024
- Decision date
- 15 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Waters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Quill on 15 August 2024 after the respondent, Barnetts Coaches Ltd, failed to present a response to the claim despite the claim information having been sent to its registered address. The tribunal recorded that the correct respondent was as named.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of GBP 1,920.00 for non-payment of wages, GBP 177.40 in respect of a GBP 114.40 ANPR camera deduction and a GBP 63 sum that should have been paid after the claimant provided a clear DBS check, and GBP 1,270.50 in respect of an unpaid bonus of GBP 1.50 per hour for 847 hours. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's full holiday entitlement and ordered payment of GBP 525.00.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 31 October 2024 and entered in the register. No legal tests were expressly cited beyond the Rule 21 procedure under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Non-payment of wages; gross sum ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,920 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Deduction of GBP 114.40 (ANPR camera) and failure to pay agreed GBP 63 after clear DBS check; gross sum GBP 177.40 ordered (rounded to integer GBP). | Upheld | — | £177 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Non-payment of bonus of GBP 1.50 per hour for 847 hours; gross sum GBP 1270.50 ordered (rounded to integer GBP). | Upheld | — | £1,271 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay full holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £525 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,893
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.