Case 3302517/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Clark v Barnett’s Coaches Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302517/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Connolly Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a private video hearing on 4 February 2025 before Employment Judge S Connolly, the tribunal rejected the respondent's application to extend time to submit a defence so far as it related to the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, parking charge and accident damage. The tribunal then ordered Barnett's Coaches Limited to pay the claimant the sums claimed on those heads.
The tribunal awarded £1,214.17 for unpaid wages and £420 for holiday pay, with deductions for tax and national insurance permitted before those payments were made. It also ordered payment without deduction for tax and national insurance of £260 for a parking charge and £225 for accident damage. The extracted text does not identify a more specific legal label for the parking charge and accident damage heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £1,214.17 for unpaid wages; the judgment states the respondent may deduct tax and national insurance before payment. | Upheld | — | £1,214 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £420 for holiday pay; the judgment states the respondent may deduct tax and national insurance before payment. | Upheld | — | £420 |
| Other | The judgment ordered payment of £260 for a parking charge. The extracted text does not state a more specific legal label for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £260 |
| Other | The judgment ordered payment of £225 for accident damage. The extracted text does not state a more specific legal label for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £225 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,119
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.