Case 3302518/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Waters v Barnett’s Coaches Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302518/2024
- Decision date
- 14 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Waters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural judgment, not a decision on the merits. By a letter dated 20 August 2025, the tribunal gave Mr H Waters an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations explaining why strike out should not occur, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
The judgment does not identify the substantive claims or decide any discrimination, wages, or working time issues. It is limited to strike out for non-pursuit, approved by Employment Judge Alliott and sent to the parties on 14 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action(s); it only states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.