Case 3302557/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Quixley & Others (as per attached Schedule) v The Book People Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302557/2020
- Decision date
- 10 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Quixley & Others (as per attached Schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in a collective redundancy context. The Claimants, listed in the attached schedule, were employees of The Book People Limited. The judgment records that the Respondent entered administration on 16 December 2019 and that the Claimants were dismissed by reason of redundancy on 10 January 2020.
The Tribunal recorded that the Respondent did not fully inform and consult the Claimants in accordance with ss.188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. On that basis, the Claimants brought a complaint under s.189 seeking a protective award.
The Tribunal made a protective award in favour of the employees listed in the schedule and ordered the Respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 56 days beginning on 10 January 2020. The judgment does not set out a cash total in the extracted text, only the length of the protected period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Consent judgment under s.189 TULRCA 1992. The Tribunal made a protective award after finding the Respondent did not fully inform and consult the Claimants in accordance with ss.188 and 188A. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.