Case 3302584/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wojcikowski v Electrical Automation (UK) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3302584/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Wojcikowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr R Wojcikowski against Electrical Automation (UK) Limited. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,848.50 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £540.00 damages. It further found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £810.00. The amounts in the judgment total £4,198.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,848.50. | Upheld | — | £2,849 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £540.00. | Upheld | — | £540 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £810.00. | Upheld | — | £810 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,199
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.