Case 3302593/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Thompson v Lockmasters Mobile (National Accounts) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302593/2025
- Decision date
- 8 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 11 May 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure on the material before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that Mrs D Thompson had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her £2,520 in damages. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,670.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £630. The total award recorded by the tribunal was £8,820.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,520 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £5,670 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement found unpaid. | Upheld | — | £630 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,820
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.