Case 3302599/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Mali Wright First v Tooth Club Op Co Limited Second Respondent: Francesca Taylor -Smith RECONSIDERATION — 2026
- Case reference
- 3302599/2025
- Decision date
- 9 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Mali Wright First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Mali Wright applied on 13 May 2026 for reconsideration of Employment Judge Young’s judgment and reasons sent that day. She challenged findings of fact and supplied an NHS document dated 7 December 2022 concerning a visit to Victoria Surgery, although some sentences in the supplied entry were cut off. At preliminary consideration, the Tribunal refused the reconsideration application. This judgment does not restate the formal disposal of the underlying disability discrimination claim.
The Tribunal found that Ms Wright had previously had ample opportunity, including through an order, to provide medical documents relevant to establishing disability before the preliminary hearing on 29 April 2026. It recorded the earlier finding that she had treated her full medical records as irrelevant and had chosen not to disclose them, despite bearing the burden of proving disability. The judge concluded that reconsideration could not be used to introduce previously available documents or relitigate matters already determined and refused the application, having regard to the overriding objective and the need for finality. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The reconsideration application was refused. The judgment does not restate the formal outcome of the underlying disability discrimination claim, so no merits outcome is inferred. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- interests of justice test under rule 68 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked under rule 70(2) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective under rule 3 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- finality principle in Liddington v 2Gether NHS Foundation Trust EAT/0002/16
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.