Case 3302601/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A. Back v Fisher Healthcare East Anglia Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302601/2021
- Decision date
- 10 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H. Mason Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A. Back
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 March 2023, at Bury St Edmunds Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge H. Mason recorded a judgment by consent in the case of Mr A Back v Fisher Healthcare East Anglia Ltd. The judgment states that the parties had agreed terms of settlement, and the matter was adjourned to allow those terms to be implemented.
The judgment did not determine liability on the merits and recorded no findings on the underlying wage or working time issues. It also recorded no monetary award.
The order provided that if neither party applied to re-list the matter by 7 April 2023, the case would stand dismissed without further order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent records that terms of settlement had been agreed; no substantive determination of liability or remedy was made. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Judgment by consent records that terms of settlement had been agreed; no substantive determination of liability or remedy was made. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.