Case 3302602/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R J Taylor v Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302602/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs J Hancock, Mr D Bean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R J Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was disabled by ankylosing spondylitis. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments by failing to adapt its absence management policy and by failing to ensure that the claimant only worked his base hours.
The tribunal found discrimination arising from disability in the respondent's use of the absence management policy, the payment of statutory sick pay instead of company sick pay after 19 May 2023, the formal written warning arising from sickness absence, the halving of the claimant's bonus because of that warning, and informing him he had not passed his probationary period as a shift manager. The direct disability discrimination complaints were dismissed.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to company sick pay for 225 hours and that the failure to pay it was an unauthorised deduction from wages. It also found that the proven disability discrimination, failures to make reasonable adjustments and failure to pay company sick pay were sufficiently serious to breach the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, and that the claimant resigned in response without affirming the contract.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal upheld complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments and discrimination arising from disability. Direct disability discrimination was dismissed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims of direct disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to company sick pay for 225 hours, but no monetary award was stated in the liability judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- Acas Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.