Case 3302608/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sadie Ellis v Stop the Spread Solutions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302608/2021
- Decision date
- 22 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sadie Ellis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Sadie Ellis brought a claim for unpaid wages against Stop the Spread Solutions Limited. The respondent did not appear or take part in the hearing before Employment Judge Michell on 17 December 2021.
The tribunal found that the claim of unpaid wages was well founded. It awarded the claimant the sums set out in the judgment: £600 for commission for September 2020, £140 for a team leader bonus calculated as 14 x £10, £96.34 for expenses, £723.50 for commission for December 2020, and £438 for basic salary for December 2020 pro rata to 22 December 2020.
Those items totalled £1,997.84, and the judgment sum was awarded in that amount. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the case as a claim of unpaid wages and found it well founded. The judgment itemised the award as £600 commission for September 2020, £140 team leader bonus, £96.34 expenses, £723.50 commission for December 2020, and £438 basic salary for December 2020 pro rata to 22 December 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,998 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,998
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.