Case 3302614/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Salter v CamelotPM Ltd in compulsory liquidation — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302614/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Salter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made a procedural decision only and did not determine the merits of any underlying employment claim. The respondent, CamelotPM Ltd, was in compulsory liquidation, and the tribunal recorded that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
On 15 March 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant, Mr A Salter, 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal found that he failed to give an acceptable reason. The claim was therefore struck out by Regional Employment Judge Foxwell on 6 May 2021, with the judgment sent to the parties on 7 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action(s) in the strike-out decision. The claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and court permission had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986; the claimant also failed to give an acceptable reason after being invited to explain non-pursuit of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.