Case 3302620/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance For the v Lt Cdr Mow Magzoub — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302620/2023
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard this matter at Watford by CVP on 7 November 2023 before Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby sitting alone. The claimant, Mr Zaccheus Gilpin, did not attend. The respondent, NATO Allied Maritime Command, was represented by Lt Cdr Mow Magzoub.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out under rule 37 of the Tribunal Rules. The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive legal basis of the claim beyond that strike-out decision.
The judgment record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. The decision was sent on 2 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not state the underlying cause of action; it records only that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.