Case 3302621/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v The Glam Shack Company Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302621/2021
- Decision date
- 11 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Smith, succeeded on three money claims against The Glam Shack Company Ltd (In Liquidation). The tribunal upheld a notice pay claim for one week’s gross pay of £865.38, an unpaid holiday pay claim for £3,288.44 relating to 19 days’ accrued but untaken holiday, and an unlawful deduction claim for a tax rebate of £208.40.
A further unlawful deduction from wages claim for the period 1 to 4 November 2020 was dismissed. The judgment does not set out written reasons because reasons had been given orally at the hearing, but the written record records the four discrete outcomes and the amounts attached to the successful claims.
The respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £4,362.22 within 28 days, being the total of the three upheld sums.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay, described as one week gross pay, was upheld. | Upheld | — | £865 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay, described as pay for 19 days holiday accrued but untaken, was upheld. | Upheld | — | £3,288 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of a tax rebate was upheld. | Upheld | — | £208 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages for the period 1 to 4 November 2020 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,362
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.