Case 3302624/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Ramanath v Sameer Ahmed and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302624/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss O Ramanath
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 March 2024, the Tribunal gave Miss O Ramanath an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 21 September 2023 and the fact that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations explaining why strike out should not be ordered, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out any remaining part of the claim.
No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment are recorded in the judgment text supplied. The decision is limited to procedural strike out under the reasons given by Employment Judge Anstis on 17 April 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the text supplied. It states that all remaining parts of the claim, if any, are struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 21 September 2023 and did not make sufficient representations after the letter dated 7 March 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.