Case 3302632/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302632/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Panel members
- Mrs V Parsons, Mr F Wright
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case record identifies Ms Suzanne Johnson as the claimant and Brayleys Cars Ltd as the respondent. The hearing took place at Watford by CVP on 17 and 18 May 2022 before Employment Judge Alliott, sitting with Mrs V Parsons and Mr F Wright. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Alice Scott of counsel.
The written judgment records that the tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claims. No written reasons were provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out the tribunal’s factual findings or legal reasoning.
On the material available in the written record, there is no monetary award and no separate remedy assessment recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states only that the claimant’s claims were dismissed. Claim type taken from the case listing category for this case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written record states only that the claimant’s claims were dismissed. Claim type taken from the case listing category for this case. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.