Case 3302634/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Alyas v Trinity College — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302634/2023
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Alyas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Alyas's claims against Trinity College were struck out by Employment Judge Anstis, sitting alone, at Reading by CVP on 8 February 2024. The written record does not set out the tribunal's substantive reasoning for the strike out, and it records only the disposal.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment is a brief disposal record and does not identify this claim individually; classification is taken from the case listing context supplied with the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment is a brief disposal record and does not identify this claim individually; classification is taken from the case listing context supplied with the judgment. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment is a brief disposal record and does not identify this claim individually; classification is taken from the case listing context supplied with the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.