Case 3302645/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dean Kelly v Andrews Tipper Hire Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302645/2024
- Decision date
- 7 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Attendance
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dean Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Dean Kelly succeeded in his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against Andrews Tipper Hire Ltd. The tribunal found that an attendance allowance of £30 and a performance allowance of £30 were not added to each day of holiday taken, and declared that this amounted to unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had taken 45.88 days of holiday. On that basis, the respondent was ordered to pay £2,752.80 gross.
The judgment did not record any separate award for interest or any additional heads of loss. It also directed that the claimant must account for any income tax and national insurance contributions on the sum awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that there had been unauthorised deductions from wages because an attendance allowance of £30 and a performance allowance of £30 were not added to each day of holiday taken. | Upheld | — | £2,753 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,753
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.