Case 3302660/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Egan v International Tree Foundation — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302660/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Egan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment on withdrawal under rule 52, Employment Judge Manley recorded that the claimant’s complaints of Public Interest Disclosure detriment and/or dismissal, breach of contract, and discrimination on grounds of religion and belief were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also records that the claimant’s remaining claim of unfair dismissal continued. No merits decision, liability finding, or remedy assessment is given in this document for that remaining claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Public Interest Disclosure detriment and/or dismissal was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Discrimination on grounds of religion and belief was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.