Case 3302681/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds 2 claims against Austens BBQ Ltd t/a Rotisserie on the Rise
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £125.05 gross, calculated as 8.9 hours at £14.05 per hour. The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice.
- Case reference
- 3302681/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge QUILL
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Tuomey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge QUILL found that Austens BBQ Ltd t/a Rotisserie on the Rise had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr S Tuomey's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £125.05 gross, calculated as 8.9 hours at £14.05 per hour.
The tribunal also found that Mr Tuomey was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,205.45, calculated as 10 x 8.9 hours at £14.05 per hour. No other claims, findings, or remedy components are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £125.05, described as 8.9 hours at £14.05 per hour. | Upheld | — | £125 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,205.45, calculated as 10 x 8.9 hours at £14.05 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,205 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,331
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.