Case 3302683/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Schard v Dreams Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302683/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Chudleigh Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Schard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was held by telephone on 29 September 2020 before Employment Judge Chudleigh. The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal after terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties.
No substantive liability findings are recorded in the judgment text. The tribunal did not make findings on the merits of the claims, and the judgment does not assess compensation or any other monetary remedy.
The available text is confined to the procedural disposal of the proceedings. It records that the matter was resolved by settlement and withdrawn, with the tribunal then dismissing the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal after terms of settlement had been agreed. The judgment text itself does not set out the substantive allegations or any liability findings. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal after terms of settlement had been agreed. The judgment text itself does not set out the substantive allegations or any liability findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.