Case 3302685/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person (at the court building). For the v Mr G Griffiths-Jones, Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302685/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (at the court building). For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Huntingdon, before Employment Judge Ord, dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. The written judgment records that the complaint was not well founded, and therefore the unfair dismissal claim failed.
The claimant's separate claim for unpaid expenses was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal also dismissed the respondent's employer's contract claim on withdrawal. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The extracted decision therefore records the outcomes only, without a fuller written explanation of the tribunal's reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claimant's claim for unpaid expenses was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's employer's contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.