Case 3302692/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Armer v Geotech Soil Stabilisation Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302692/2020
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Armer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Hawksworth determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that Mr P Armer had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded him £13,339, described as 1.5 months' notice. The judgment states that this sum was gross before deduction of tax and national insurance.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,679 in respect of 6 days' holiday, again described as a gross amount before deduction of tax and national insurance. The total of the two awards was £16,018.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £13,339, described as 1.5 months' notice gross before deduction of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £13,339 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £2,679 for 6 days' holiday, gross before deduction of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £2,679 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,018
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.